tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14093712.post7357360724483270491..comments2023-08-23T05:08:43.262-07:00Comments on Little Notes: The problem with slogs (How I lost everything!)...jmlittle@gmail.com (Joe Little)http://www.blogger.com/profile/09731419203596760536noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14093712.post-34785066693002661812008-12-24T04:36:00.000-08:002008-12-24T04:36:00.000-08:00Just partially.. :)Just partially.. :)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14773622603562345086noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14093712.post-71329070897817059562008-05-27T16:01:00.000-07:002008-05-27T16:01:00.000-07:00Eric Schrock noted over in the zfs-discuss list th...Eric Schrock noted over in the zfs-discuss list that " The basic problem is that log devices are kept within the normal vdev tree, and are only distinguished by a bit indicating that they are log devices (and is the source for a number of other inconsistencies that Pwel has encountered).<BR/><BR/>When doing a replacement, the userland code is responsible for creating the vdev configuration to use for the newly attached vdev. In this case, it doesn't preserve the 'is_log' bit correctly. This should be enforced in the kernel - it doesn't make sense to replace a log device with a non-log device, ever."<BR/><BR/>So, I'm not completely nuts :)jmlittle@gmail.com (Joe Little)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09731419203596760536noreply@blogger.com